By the power of YouTube this video has become an overnight sensation, even provoking video responses from people, both in support of the intoxicated slurring mother, and condemning her attitude. To be honest, I found the first response I clicked on more offensive than the original sensation. I don't think I made it more than one minute through that video before being compelled to turn it off. The reason being that the considerably younger lad speaking to the camera had obviously planned out his response; it was not an impulsive act like the rant on the tram.
Most responses to this tram footage have called for the woman to be punished or to have her child taken away from her. What she was saying was horrendous, but freedom of speech is integral to democracy, and if you’re calling for her right to rant to be taken away from her, don’t be too surprised if your right is taken from you too. The law should not be responsible for condemning racist behaviour – society should be. It’s up to you to breed attitudes of tolerance and understanding. Though really, this can go beyond tolerance and understanding, and more towards education. So maybe the institution of education should take some responsibility as well.
I do feel the slightest bit sorry for this woman. It is barely dinner time and she is drunk, or stoned. This may be short sighted of me, but only someone who is unhappy would be in such a state at that time of day whilst being responsible for a small child. Moreover, her opinions speak to a lack of knowledge and education regarding “her Britain”.
It was “her Britain” who colonised the countries of Africa that she failed to correctly identify, and exploited the people who lived there. I am sure that they would have been screaming “go back to where you came from” on YouTube if such technology existed for them to be heard. And I am sure that the colonising British (and other nations) did far worse to those people than their ancestors are now doing to us in Britain. But when we are taught about Great Britain at school, the focus is not on the exploitation the colonised experienced in the hands of our ancestors.
Presuming she isn’t a fan of Hitler, it is also obvious that she wasn’t taught how the people of those colonised countries fought on the side of the British against the Nazis. If she was taught this, maybe she would be more accepting of people with different colour skin to her own.
There are many instances in history that, if taught, could lead to greater acceptance and lesser racism.
Another institution that could be held responsible for this woman’s attitudes, and the attitudes of many others like her, is the rightwing press. (Notice how I am careful not to lump ALL media institutions together here. There are plenty of publications that don't spout racist hatred.) Does she not sound a bit like a voice from the Daily Mail or the Sun? “Sort out your own countries [...] Britain is nothing now [...] My Britain is fuck all now.” The irony here is her minimal grasp of her own language. But that aside, most discussions about immigration in the rightwing press involve racist rants and strange statistics that don’t really illustrate anything helpful. The responsibility of the press, and whether or not their conduct is in the public interest, is currently being investigated and debated. This video is a timely example of how the opinions of the most popular newspapers in Britain breed negative, uninformed hatred. It is the responsibility of these tabloids to ensure they provide correct information, and that their bias is negated far more than is currently the case.
This woman should not be arrested for racist ranting, and nor should her child be taken into care for her bad attitude. She is a product of her environment: if you are constantly being told that immigration is a bad thing by national institutions, you cannot be held solely responsible for your bad attitude. However, ignorance is ultimately not an excuse. But be aware, that if her democratic rights are taken away from her, yours will be next.